Turning Point Action has publicly stated they want to take over SRP. The "Elected Leadership for SRP" slate suddenly appears with 10 coordinated candidates. Coincidence? We're asking the questions.
Turning Point USA (TPUSA) is a national conservative advocacy organization founded in 2012, known for its presence on college campuses and youth-focused political activism. It's led by Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative media figure.
Turning Point Action (TPAction) is its 501(c)(4) political arm—the organization that engages directly in elections, grassroots organizing, and voter mobilization. They've publicly declared their intent to reshape the SRP board.
Tyler Bowyer, TPAction's Chief Operating Officer, is based in Arizona and has made the SRP election a personal priority. He's publicly declared their intent to reshape the SRP board.
"We're going to get the radical environmentalists out of SRP."
— Tyler Bowyer, TPAction COO
"We need affordable, reliable power — not activists and extremists."
— TPAction Social Media Post
"Green New Deal policies mean higher bills for families."
— TPAction Messaging
When TPAction talks about "radical environmentalists" and "Green New Deal extremists," they mean people who support:
In other words: mainstream clean energy policy that most utilities are adopting.
SRP's unique structure makes it an attractive target for organized political groups.
Most SRP elections see tiny turnout. A well-organized group can swing results with relatively few votes.
Most customers don't even know they can vote in SRP elections, or that the board sets their rates.
SRP serves 1+ million customers with a $3B+ budget. Control the board, control energy policy for the region.
"A relatively obscure utility board race has become a battleground for the conservative activist group."
— Axios reporting on TPAction's SRP involvement
The public statements and timing that raise questions
TPAction operatives begin door-to-door canvassing in SRP neighborhoods, registering voters and building lists for the upcoming election.
Tyler Bowyer publicly announces TPAction's focus on the SRP election via social media, declaring their intent to "get the radical environmentalists out."
The "Elected Leadership for SRP" slate is assembled and their website launches, promoting four candidates aligned with TPAction's goals.
TPAction canvassers claim to have registered thousands of new SRP voters, aiming to tip the scales in low-turnout elections.
TPAction deploys field staff and volunteers across SRP districts, distributing campaign materials and organizing voter outreach.
The "Elected Leadership for SRP" slate faces voters. The outcome will determine whether these candidates—and whoever is behind them—gain control of your utility board.
Local leaders and observers have raised concerns about TPAction's involvement
"These candidates are likely to oppose renewables, support fossil fuels, and ultimately raise rates."
— Sandra Kennedy, Current SRP Board Member
"Turning Point seems to think they need a board that will just rubber stamp whatever management brings... that's what they used to have."
— Sandy Bahr, Sierra Club Grand Canyon Chapter Director
TPAction doesn't work alone. The SRP election has drawn involvement from related political action committees and organizations:
A related PAC that has indicated coordination with TPAction efforts in the SRP election.
The parent organization providing infrastructure, media support, and national profile to local efforts.
Note: Campaign finance details will be updated as filings become available. Check the Arizona Secretary of State's website for official records.
TPAction has publicly stated their goals. The "Elected Leadership for SRP" slate won't say if they're connected. Don't you deserve to know?